Comments for David Vosburg - creativity in a cardigan http://davidvosburg.com/me Just another WordPress weblog Mon, 16 May 2011 14:34:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 Comment on Creatives & Non-Profits by backlinks http://davidvosburg.com/me/creatives-non-profits/comment-page-1/#comment-5828 backlinks Mon, 16 May 2011 14:34:29 +0000 http://davidvosburg.com/me/?p=490#comment-5828 It’s arduous to search out educated folks on this subject, but you sound like you understand what you’re speaking about! Thanks It’s arduous to search out educated folks on this subject, but you sound like you understand what you’re speaking about! Thanks

]]> Comment on This Post Is Not 3D by Kum Destefani http://davidvosburg.com/me/this-post-is-not-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-5092 Kum Destefani Sun, 17 Apr 2011 09:52:36 +0000 http://davidvosburg.com/me/?p=1227#comment-5092 <a href="http://www.my3dmovies.net/2011/04/04/saw-3d-the-final-chapter-two-disc-combo-blu-ray-3d-blu-ray-dvd-digital-copy/" rel="nofollow">Saw 3D</a> - The best 3d movie with best effects, technology and.. you know Saw! ;) Saw 3D – The best 3d movie with best effects, technology and.. you know Saw! ;)

]]> Comment on Learning to Learn by Karl http://davidvosburg.com/me/learning-to-learn/comment-page-1/#comment-2221 Karl Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:49:42 +0000 http://davidvosburg.com/me/?p=893#comment-2221 How to be a Graphic Designer without losing your soul, is a must read! How to be a Graphic Designer without losing your soul, is a must read!

]]> Comment on Learning to Learn by Karl Power http://davidvosburg.com/me/learning-to-learn/comment-page-1/#comment-2076 Karl Power Tue, 16 Nov 2010 19:07:06 +0000 http://davidvosburg.com/me/?p=893#comment-2076 Hi David. I really enjoyed reading your article. It definitely struck a chord with me. I am currently in my final year of a graphic design degree, however i think i have been a student of design all my life. Without really knowing why for many years, i was always turned on by different cultures and had an innate appreciation for art. I would see the extrovert and passion in a person where somebody else would only see bullshit. I remember walking around San Francisco and collecting every postcard and flyer i came across and wandering 'why am i doing this'. I think a lot of what you have mentioned above is inherent to a designers mentality, I'm not sure it's esoteric but it's part of their nature to seek out and document information. To collect inspiration and ephemera. To always want to learn and to experiment. Experimentation is learning and it is the best way we have available to us for improvement at what ever we do. Especially in the creative arts. Not using it, not willing to experiment and learn everyday detracts from a very rewarding experience.. anyway after reading your article I have new vigor for the game and You have opened my eyes to seeking out a mentor. great words. thanks K Hi David. I really enjoyed reading your article. It definitely struck a chord with me. I am currently in my final year of a graphic design degree, however i think i have been a student of design all my life. Without really knowing why for many years, i was always turned on by different cultures and had an innate appreciation for art. I would see the extrovert and passion in a person where somebody else would only see bullshit. I remember walking around San Francisco and collecting every postcard and flyer i came across and wandering ‘why am i doing this’. I think a lot of what you have mentioned above is inherent to a designers mentality, I’m not sure it’s esoteric but it’s part of their nature to seek out and document information. To collect inspiration and ephemera. To always want to learn and to experiment. Experimentation is learning and it is the best way we have available to us for improvement at what ever we do. Especially in the creative arts. Not using it, not willing to experiment and learn everyday detracts from a very rewarding experience.. anyway after reading your article I have new vigor for the game and You have opened my eyes to seeking out a mentor. great words. thanks K

]]> Comment on This Post Is Not 3D by Youssef Sarhan http://davidvosburg.com/me/this-post-is-not-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-393 Youssef Sarhan Mon, 07 Jun 2010 18:00:21 +0000 http://davidvosburg.com/me/?p=1227#comment-393 I think we all know (Cameron Included) that 3d is a bit cheap. It just doesn't look that great. At first it's cool, very cool in fact, but for a feature film it's just a bit much. The industry loves it as it almost guarantees more money in the box office. Less camera recordings online, less chance of the 'flat' version leaking, and higher ticket prices. I think we'll all look back at the 3d trend in the same way we look back at glam rock. WTF? I think we all know (Cameron Included) that 3d is a bit cheap. It just doesn’t look that great.

At first it’s cool, very cool in fact, but for a feature film it’s just a bit much. The industry loves it as it almost guarantees more money in the box office. Less camera recordings online, less chance of the ‘flat’ version leaking, and higher ticket prices.

I think we’ll all look back at the 3d trend in the same way we look back at glam rock. WTF?

]]> Comment on This Post Is Not 3D by David Wallace http://davidvosburg.com/me/this-post-is-not-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-244 David Wallace Mon, 03 May 2010 14:05:54 +0000 http://davidvosburg.com/me/?p=1227#comment-244 Roger Ebert: Why I Hate 3-D Movies - http://www.newsweek.com/id/237110/page/1 Roger Ebert: Why I Hate 3-D Movies – http://www.newsweek.com/id/237110/page/1

]]> Comment on This Post Is Not 3D by This Post Is Not 3D | Vodule http://davidvosburg.com/me/this-post-is-not-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-234 This Post Is Not 3D | Vodule Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:22:27 +0000 http://davidvosburg.com/me/?p=1227#comment-234 [...] Read commentary at this-post-is-not-3d [...] [...] Read commentary at this-post-is-not-3d [...]

]]> Comment on This Post Is Not 3D by Daniel http://davidvosburg.com/me/this-post-is-not-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-232 Daniel Wed, 28 Apr 2010 04:14:43 +0000 http://davidvosburg.com/me/?p=1227#comment-232 very nicely done! very nicely done!

]]> Comment on This Post Is Not 3D by David Williams http://davidvosburg.com/me/this-post-is-not-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-231 David Williams Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:59:25 +0000 http://davidvosburg.com/me/?p=1227#comment-231 I can see this 3D extravaganza as an experiment in which the "best" representation of current technology is placed before human test subjects to see if it is ready for true mainstream. With commonplace two-dimensional resolutions exceeding the human eye's ability to discern, what is left for technology to conquer but a good three-dimensional visual representation? Well, like you say, it's not there yet. I'm holding out for holograms! I can see this 3D extravaganza as an experiment in which the “best” representation of current technology is placed before human test subjects to see if it is ready for true mainstream. With commonplace two-dimensional resolutions exceeding the human eye’s ability to discern, what is left for technology to conquer but a good three-dimensional visual representation? Well, like you say, it’s not there yet. I’m holding out for holograms!

]]> Comment on This Post Is Not 3D by Jake http://davidvosburg.com/me/this-post-is-not-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-225 Jake Mon, 26 Apr 2010 01:27:25 +0000 http://davidvosburg.com/me/?p=1227#comment-225 I'd have to agree. 3D was just as popular in the 50s as it is now. The technology has gotten much better, but I have two problems with it still. Frame Rate: I've read that IMAX has been testing shooting at 60fps, which I think would be something to see ,since the 24fps that is in theaters now (for 3D) has quite a lag in motion blurs. Darkness: When the glasses are put on, the picture becomes slightly darker, but enough to notice when the glasses are put back on. There's also an even slighter green tint to the picture. If they could find a solution to these things, I would be much more interested in seeing 3D films, shot with 3D cameras, 2D to 3D is not acceptable :) I’d have to agree. 3D was just as popular in the 50s as it is now. The technology has gotten much better, but I have two problems with it still.

Frame Rate: I’ve read that IMAX has been testing shooting at 60fps, which I think would be something to see ,since the 24fps that is in theaters now (for 3D) has quite a lag in motion blurs.

Darkness: When the glasses are put on, the picture becomes slightly darker, but enough to notice when the glasses are put back on. There’s also an even slighter green tint to the picture.

If they could find a solution to these things, I would be much more interested in seeing 3D films, shot with 3D cameras, 2D to 3D is not acceptable :)

]]>